Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/3493
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBatran, Raghad$Other$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorAyed, Ahmad$AAUP$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorBatran, Ahmad$Other$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorAbu Ejheisheh, Moath$Other$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorAlassoud, Bahaa$Other$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorHayek, Mohammad$Other$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorBatran, Ali$Other$Palestinian-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T04:46:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-22T04:46:31Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-30-
dc.identifier.issnE-ISSN: 2377-9608-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/3493-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: It is widely recognized that critical care environments significantly increase the risk of infection for both patients and healthcare personnel. Purpose: This study aimed to assess the determinants of nurses’ compliance with infection prevention and control practices in critical care units. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 155 nurses working in critical care units. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that measured sociodemographic characteristics, compliance, knowledge, and perceptions of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Statistical analyses, including multiple linear regression, were performed to assess predictors of compliance with IPC practices. This study was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines to ensure transparency and rigor in the reporting of the methodology and findings. Results: A total of 155 nurses participated in the study, yielding a response rate of 91.1%. Seventy-one percent demonstrated good compliance with IPC practices, while only 39.4% exhibited moderate knowledge of IPC guidelines. Experience in critical care (β=3.542, p < .05) and institutional support (β=0.246, p < .01) were significant predictors of compliance, highlighting the importance of both factors in promoting adherence to IPC practices. Conclusion: Although compliance with IPC practices was generally high, gaps in knowledge and perception suggest the need for enhanced educational initiatives and institutional support to further improve IPC adherence. Future research should focus on developing strategies that address these gaps to ensure sustainable compliance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNAen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Open Nursingen_US
dc.subjectcritical careen_US
dc.subjectcomplianceen_US
dc.subjecthealthcare-associated infectionsen_US
dc.subjectinfection preventionen_US
dc.subjectperceptionen_US
dc.titleDeterminants of Nurses’ Compliance with Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Critical Care Unitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty & Staff Scientific Research publications

Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Admin Tools