Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/1493
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authoral-omari wm-
dc.contributor.authorshadid r-
dc.contributor.authorabu-naba'a l-
dc.contributor.authorel masoud b.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-07T07:45:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-07T07:45:10Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-29-
dc.identifier.citationAl-Omari WM, Shadid R, Abu-Naba'a L, El Masoud B. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;19(4):263-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00560.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29. PMID: 20136704.en_US
dc.identifier.issnDOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00560.x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/1493-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the porcelain fracture resistance between screw-retained, cement-retained, and combined screw- and cement-retained metal-ceramic (MC) implant-supported posterior single crowns; and to investigate the effect of offsetting the occlusal screw-access opening on porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained MC implant-supported posterior single crowns. Materials and methods: Forty standardized MC molar-shaped restorations were fabricated. The 40 restorations were divided into four groups (SRC, SRO, CRP, and CSC) of 10 specimens each. Group SRC: screw-retained, screw-access hole placed in the center of the occlusal surface; Group SRO: screw-retained, screw access hole placed 1 mm offset from the center of the occlusal surface toward the buccal cusp; Group CRP: cement-retained, zinc phosphate cement was used; Group CSC: cement-retained with a screw-access hole in the center of the occlusal surface. The screw-retained restorations and abutments were directly attached to 3i implant fixtures embedded in acrylic resin blocks. Subsequently, all test specimens were thermocycled and vertically loaded in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min until fracture. Mean values of load at fracture (in N) were calculated in each group and compared with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Studentized test (alpha= 0.05). Results: Mean values of loads required to fracture the restorations were as follows (N): Group SRC: 1721 +/- 593; Group SRO: 1885 +/- 491; Group CRP: 3707 +/- 1086; Group CSC: 1700 +/- 526. Groups SRC, SRO, and CSC required a significantly lower force to fracture the porcelain than did the CRP group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The cement-retained restorations showed significantly higher mean fracture loads than the restorations having screw-access openings in their occlusal surface. The position of the screw-access hole within the occlusal surface did not significantly affect the porcelain fracture resistance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJordan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe American College of Prosthodontistsen_US
dc.titlePorcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty & Staff Scientific Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Porcelain_Fracture_Resistance_of_ScrewRe.pdf272.18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Admin Tools