Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/1854
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKassabry-
dc.contributor.authorAl-Kalaldeh, Mahmoud $Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorAyed, Ahmad$AAUP$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Shosha, Ghada$Other$Other-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T08:12:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-08T08:12:14Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-07-
dc.identifier.issnISSN:1471-5953-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/1854-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The unfolding case-study learning approach is a growing modernized learning strategy implemented in different health disciplines. However, there is a lack of existing research that examines the effects of unfolding case studies in advanced nursing courses. Aim: To examine the impact of applying an unfolding case-study learning approach on critical care nursing students’ knowledge, critical thinking, and self-efficacy. Methods: This posttest-only, quasi-experimental study was conducted at XXX University in Palestine. A single stage cluster sampling was used to assign nursing students enrolled in the critical care nursing course into experiment and conventional groups. The intervention group (n= 91) underwent unfolding case-study learning for selected cardiovascular topics, whereas the conventional group (n= 78) was taught using the traditional teaching methods. The posttest assessment was conducted using Knowledge Acquisition tests, Yoon`s Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument (YCTD), and the Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance instruments. The Social Constructivist Theoretical Framework was integrated into the study. Results: Homogeneity was achieved between both groups concerning Age, Gender, and GPA. The experiment group scored significantly higher than the conventional group regarding the posttest knowledge acquisition tests (7.12 vs. 5.49, respectively, t=-12.7, P<0.001, CI: 􀀀 1.89 to 􀀀 1.38), critical thinking (4.32 vs. 3.63 respectively, t=17.390, p<0.001, CI: 􀀀 77 to 􀀀 61) and self-efficacy (6.12 vs. 4.4 respectively, t=-30.897, p<0.001, CI: 􀀀 1.82 to 􀀀 1.60). Multivariate analysis revealed that 69 % of the variations of posttest scores were influenced by critical thinking scores (Adjusted R Squared=0.690, F=3.47, P=0002, η2=0.969). Similarly, self-efficacy has been shown to contribute by 74 % to the variations of scores after conducting the study program (Adjusted R Squared=0.743, F=4.21, P=0001, η2=0.974). However, the variations of both critical thinking and self-efficacy scores were not significantly influenced by the contribution of knowledge acquisition (p=0.772 and 0.857, respectively) and students’ GPA (p=0.305 and 0.956, respectively). Conclusions: Irrespective of knowledge level and GPA, the unfolding case-study learning approach can enhance the critical thinking and self-efficacy of students enrolling in advanced nursing courses.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNurse Education in Practice/ elsevieren_US
dc.subjectUnfolding case-studyen_US
dc.subjectCritical thinkingen_US
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectNursing studentsen_US
dc.titleThe impact of applying unfolding case-study learning on critical care nursing students’ knowledge, critical thinking, and self-efficacy; a quasi-experimental studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty & Staff Scientific Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1471595324001446-main-1.pdf236.59 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Admin Tools