Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/3586
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOthman, Elham $Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorAljafreh, Mahmoud$Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorAlosta, Mohammad $Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorMasadeh, Rami $Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Bridget$Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorAlsharawneh, Anas$Other$Other-
dc.contributor.authorAyed, Ahmad$AAUP$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorZeilani, Ruqayya$Other$Other-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T12:50:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-29T12:50:16Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-01-
dc.identifier.issnE-ISSN: 1472-6963-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/3586-
dc.description.abstractBackground The Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale was originally formulated in English to examine patient-centeredness. Objective To translate and validate the PPPC-R questionnaire into Arabic. Methodology Translating the PPPC-R into Arabic involved forward and back translations by bilingual experts. Content validity was checked through the Item and Scale Content Validity Indices. The instrument underwent pilot testing and was then completed by 179 patients in the emergency department to examine construct validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure internal consistency. Results The Item Content Validity Index ranged between 0.66 and 1, and the Scale Content Validity Index was 0.96. Initial confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic-PPPC-R revealed an inadequate fit, prompting an exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation, which identified three factors that explained 66.3% of the variance. The refined model, tested again using confirmatory factor analysis, demonstrated an acceptable fit with improved statistical measures, including CFI and TLI values above 0.90 and RMSEA of 0.07. Reliability testing revealed high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.949 for the full scale and between 0.889 and 0.906 for the individual subscales. Conclusion The study findings showed that the Arabic version of the PPPC-R has good structural characteristics and is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring patient-centeredness.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNAen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC Health Services Researchen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Centerednessen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Centered careen_US
dc.subjectPatient perceptionen_US
dc.subjectFactor analysisen_US
dc.subjectTranslationen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.titleArabic translation and psychometric validation of the revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) questionnaireen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty & Staff Scientific Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Arabic translation and psychometric.pdf1.44 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Admin Tools