Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/3619
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQoraan, Iman$AAUP$Palestinian-
dc.contributor.authorSawalha, Hazem$AAUP$Palestinian-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-08T09:34:41Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-08T09:34:41Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-22-
dc.identifier.citationSawalha, H. D., Qalalweh, G., Nazzal, H., Kmail, A., & Qoraan, I. (2025). Antibacterial potential of plant extracts against foodborne pathogenic bacteria: A phytochemical and bioactive analysis. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 19(3), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.19.3.48en_US
dc.identifier.issnhttps://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.19.3.48-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aaup.edu/jspui/handle/123456789/3619-
dc.descriptionThis article represents a collaborative work between the Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, and the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.abstractMedicinal plants are widely used as part of home remedies to cure human diseases. The current research was conducted to explore the antibacterial effectiveness of Artemisia vulgaris, Nigella sativa, Origanum majorana, Moringa oleifera, Tetragonolobus purpureus, Camellia sinensis, Dolomiaea costus, Urtica dioica, and Ephedra viridis against human bacterial pathogens linked to gastrointestinal diseases. Qualitative and quantitative methods were applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the plant extracted material toward Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Bacillus subtilis, and Staphylococcus aureus. The analysis included agar diffusion method (ADM), Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Broth Microdilution (BMD), and Phytochemical analysis of the extracts. The largest zones of ADM were obtained from U. dioica seeds against both B. subtilis and S. aureus. N. sativa was second in its ability to inhibit the same bacteria. M. oleifera showed apparent growth inhibition of B. subtilis. C. sinensis revealed moderate activity against S. aureus, E. coli, and P. vulgaris. The results of the BMD test showed that U. dioica, M. oleifera, N. sativa, and C. sinensis were effective against the tested bacteria. MIC50 ranged from 14.15-271.44 mg/ml against the tested bacteria. Phytochemical analysis showed that the test plants contained significant and variable antibacterial agents. The diversity of these agents explains their strong and different ability to inhibit bacterial growth. The research revealed the effectiveness of U. dioica, N. sativa, and M. oleifera seed extracts in combating bacteria that cause food poisoning while demonstrating the ineffectiveness of certain plants commonly prescribed to treat such diseases.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo sponsorsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of pure and applied microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;19(3):2211–2226-
dc.subjectMedicinal Plantsen_US
dc.subjectFoodborne Pathogensen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial Activity,en_US
dc.subjectPhytochemical Analysisen_US
dc.subjectHerbal Shopsen_US
dc.titleAntibacterial potential of plant extracts against foodborne pathogenic bacteria: A phytochemical and bioactive analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty & Staff Scientific Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Article.pdfAntibacterial Potential of Plant Extracts against Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: A Phytochemical and Bioactive Analysis1.44 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Admin Tools